Essay Sample For A Masters Dissertation in Urban Planning

Essay Sample For A Master's Dissertation in Urban PlanningIf you are planning to apply for a Masters in Urban Planning, you will need to write a great master's thesis. There are many different kinds of master's thesis that you can choose from, so depending on what kind of course you are taking, you might need to research the most popular kinds of courses on how to create a thesis.Thesis writing is one of the main requirements for a Master of Urban Planning. It is a significant task because it involves finding and citing specific academic sources to back up the arguments in your thesis. Writing an effective master's thesis can be challenging, especially if you do not have a lot of experience in essay writing.If you are thinking about preparing for this kind of a paper, you need to know that you will need to become more comfortable with the concepts that you are writing about. Students need to find resources on the Internet that can help them learn how to structure a thesis. There are many different types of resources that can help them along the way. Since it is a complex topic, there are more ways than ever to achieve high standards in writing an impressive master's thesis.There are many essay samples out there that can help you be prepared. The best thing about essay samples is that they give you tips that will help you be successful in creating a master's thesis. A number of these essay samples are available online for you to download and use. This is one way that you can learn how to write a great master's thesis without having to spend the money on expensive classes.Since an essay sample can be very helpful to students, it is a good idea to read through as many as you can find. You will want to look at sample essays by different professors to get an idea of what the typical types of master's thesis papers are like. This will help you to learn about the types of topics that are commonly used by different professors and students to prepare for such a project. When you read through as many of these samples as possible, you will be able to notice some similarities and differences between the topics of the samples and the type of projects that you will be working on. In addition, you will want to take a look at the writing styles of the authors. By looking at these writers, you will be able to gain a better understanding of how they plan to structure their essays. Once you have this information, you will be ready to go find the best essay samples for you to review.Although essay samples are a great place to get started in writing your master's thesis in urban planning, you should be careful when selecting the samples. It is important that you find a sample that is appropriate for the topic that you are researching. As you continue reading the samples, you will see that some are written in a way that will be more difficult than others. You need to understand that there are ways to turn these essay samples into successful master's thesis pape rs.By having a good understanding of what is required for a master's thesis in urban planning, you will be able to get your work finished much faster. You will also be prepared to defend your thesis if you ever decide to go to graduate school. You can use your newfound knowledge and expertise to impress your future employers with your writing skills. Be sure to follow this advice and create a master's thesis on the topics you study well.

Hot Fuss by The Killers free essay sample

Every great album has its own unique elements that separate it from all the others. In this case, Hot Fuss molded the path to a 4 1/2-star rating on iTunes through a murder trilogy, a song about wanting to do something unforgettable, and several tracks about love with aspects to them that you wont find anywhere else. Formed in Las Vegas, Nevada in 2001 by Brandon Flowers (the lead vocalist), The Killers made their ultimate breakthrough with Hot Fuss, their debut album, in 2004. Songs like Mr. Brightside, Smile Like You Mean It, Somebody Told Me, and All These Things That Ive Done gave the album a catchy feel and all ranked in the Top 10 in both the UK and US. So, did the other songs deserve the same attention? Jenny Was a Friend of Mine | The Killers made their murder trilogy tricky, but understandable to those with open ears. The first track is actually the last part of the triumvirate, the first part being Leave The Bourbon on the Shelf (part of their third album, Sawdust) and the second part being one of the later songs in Hot Fuss, Midnight Show. We will write a custom essay sample on Hot Fuss by The Killers or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Jenny Was a Friend of Mine has one of the more literal set of lyrics, discussing how the narrator kills his friend (Jenny) and is going in for frequent questioning. The classic rock vibe mashes excellently with the panicked tone of Flowerss voice, which leads to more signs pointing in the direction of the narrator being guilty. As it is known in The Killers songs, the lyrics in the second verse can unexpectedly alter thus, making the song all the more fascinating. The backstory is revealed in the first two parts, but Jenny Was a Friend of Mine ties up as many loose ends as it can whilst still leaving the outcome vague and pleasantly mysterious. 2. Mr. Brightside | The logical question here would be, Who doesnt know this song? Upon listening to this song on the radio, I instantly fell in love and wanted to look into the band. A week later, I bought the whole album. Nine years after the album was released, and the local radio station is still playing this song? Yes, this song did deserve all the attention it got. The chorus encompasses the overall meaning of the song the narrator finds out his girlfriend is cheating on him (Shes touching his chest, now/he takes off her dress, now), or at least a friend that is with another guy. But, in this case, he doesnt murder her. While the song holds just as much significance as the others, its clear that its known more for its popular lyrics than its simplistic meaning. The perfect use of synthesizers combined with the stuck-in-your-head tune made this the catchiest song on the album for many fans, and rightfully so. 3. Smile Like You Mean It | The intended meaning of this track seals the deal as one of my favorite songs on Hot Fuss. For those wanting to listen to a reflective song about childhood and fast-forwarding into the future, but not having that too-frequently-used, depressing ambience of looking back at the past, Smile Like You Mean It is the perfect fit. Its not even the least bit surprising that this made the top charts in two countries. As Billboard stated, the song seems to deal with coming to terms with growing up and getting older. Each verse, backed by the impressive guitar chords, consists of memories that the narrator had through childhood and adolescence, and the thought-provoking fact about how its vital to think through your decisions and make the best choices you can before its too late. It doesnt sugarcoat reality, but it Smile Like You Mean It still provides the most optimistic outlook on life while simultaneously being realistic. 4. Somebody Told Me | Even though the song has been praised to and fro by critics across the globe, even the biggest fan of The Killers has to admit that its main line is odd. Somebody told me that you had a boyfriend/who looked like a girlfriend that I had in February of last year. For several days of listening to this particular song over and over again, I wondered if it was as unusual as it seemed, so I contemplated alternate meanings that I may have been missing. It turns out, however, that I was over-thinking it. Brandon Flowers is as literal as can be when he talks about an ex-girlfriend that possibly swapped genders. The verses build up to an even bigger picture that ends up being a guy (the narrator) chasing a girl that wont pay any attention to him, and then finding out that little secret. Its obvious that Flowers pours emotion into all his songs, but in Somebody Told Me, it pertains to the order of lyrics, which makes the storyline all the more realistic. In the opening ve rse, Breaking my back just to know your name/seventeen tracks and Ive had it with this game, you can clearly tell, just by the tone of his voice, that the narrator is sick and tired of chasing this girl that seems to not want to be found. Then, in the chorus, he becomes frantic because he wants to know the truth behind the rumor. Not to mention the exceptional use of the synthesizers and guitar, of course. This song is a rock masterpiece, and I applaud The Killers for this stunning track. 5. All These Things That Ive Done | If I had absolutely had to pick one favorite, this would be it. Now, if a song is over five minutes, some of them have a tendency to just be too long. Nobody wants to have that song that theyre inclined to skip over because of the extreme and unnecessarily longevity of it. And then there are those that are very catchy, use every minute to its advantage, and is still loved by thousands of people. All These Things That Ive Done executes that perfectly. Though the meaning is momentous, its also quite basic and very relatable. There are many people who want to do something memorable this songs example is being a soldier, but you can interpret that any way you choose: a soldier could be someone who does something memorable, or it could only be someone in the army. (Yes, theres a difference.) My favorite line, Ive got soul, but Im not a soldier, is the line I would use to represent this song. The narrator feels like he and many others have the potentia l to do something big, but just dont know how to get there, and Im sure weve all felt that way to some extent. Listening to this song sends chills through my spine and Im certain its done the same to others. 6. Andy, Youre a Star | It may surprise some of you, but not all songs with names in the title necessarily mean theyre about love. Brandon Flowers confirmed that the sixth track on Hot Fuss is not about him complimenting a girl, but reassuring a boy. The meaning of this song is so valuable, and provides so much insight into the hellhole that high school can be and one example of that. Andy is one of the top athletes of his school, and has noteworthy skills; but his 10 minutes of fame takes a turn for the worse, because that 10 minutes couldve transformed into something so much bigger. Andy sacrifices this by doing drugs, wasting his time by having sexual interactions with a girl (In a car with a girl/promise me shes not your world), and not concentrating on things of vitality. The people that are glorified for their athletic abilities take that recognition for granted, and the narrator wants Andy to know that he could make it big if he halted these dumb and costly actions. The song is short, simple but I believe that its inspirational. Its not degrading those who are popular, but lifting up the ones who deserve it. The bold bass chords blend remarkably with Flowerss serious tone, making it another favorite of mine on the album. 7. On Top | The interpretations for this particular song have varied, but from what Ive concluded (after a bit of research, I might add), this song is about a mans sexual intercourse with a girl. The first line, Remember Rio, and get down obviously has to do with the hotel/casino in Las Vegas (where the band formed). The narrator has been waiting all night to find a girl he wants to have sex with, and then finds that one girl who seems to be shy and hesitant. From that point on, people seem to interpret the song differently, but I acquired some information about Rio and found out that it has roof access. The title of the song seems to refer to the narrator and the girl he had sexual interactions with going on top of the building. It could be a stretch, but its a theory in progress. Even though On Top isnt one of my favorites of the album, it is, nevertheless, very catchy, and its a nice refresher from the common songs that, unlike this one, dont get down to the nitty-gritty. 8. Change Your Mind | This is definitely one of the more basic songs on the album, but it doesnt lack the the classic rock semblance that all the other songs carry. Sure, its a little slow and not nearly as energetic as, say, Midnight Show, but adding this one track even made it more apparent that the songs dont blend together at all. The lyrics are practically transparent: the narrator is telling how he was in love with a girl, how they tried to make their relationship work, and how it failed. Now, hes burdened by these constant feelings that sneak up on him about how he still feels something for the girl. The result isnt insinuated; the song just discusses the problem itself, which I love. Many beautiful songs tell a thorough story, but this one sticks solely to the predicament, which is uncomplicated yet soothing to listen to. 9. Believe Me Natalie | After talking to many people who have a mutual interest in The Killers (and, more specifically, Hot Fuss), about half those people talked nonstop about Believe Me Natalie. Several of them said that not only was this track their favorite of the album, but their favorite song of all time, which was incentive enough for me to go listen to it. Although I couldnt say that its my favorite of the album, you cant fully understand Hot Fuss without listening to Believe Me Natalie. Its beautiful in its entirety; it consists of The Killers signature rock theme, but has a complex, underlying meaning of the song that leaves fans puzzled at the first listen. Despite the fact that what the narrator is trying to convey seems quite obvious, you end up second-guessing yourself. The compilation of lyrics doesnt just talk about Natalies bucket list or that she should literally dance to disco. Just like in On Top, interpretations start to differentiate from here, so take it as you will: it could be about love, about a girl not daring enough to do the things shed always wanted to do, etc. Its undeniable, though, that Hot Fuss wouldnt be the same without this in-depth and solemn yet gracious song. 10. Midnight Show | The second part of the murder trilogy is my favorite for numerous reasons. The music alone is unpredictable and powerful, but when accompanied by the lyrics, it unites several of the missing pieces of the murder trilogy and then, followed by Jenny Was a Friend of Mine, which completes the sequence. Midnight Show trails the physical events of the murder itself (She turned her face to speak/but no one her cry), but avoids the gruesome details by the flawless use of metaphors. As screwed-up as this trilogy may be to some, Flowers went down a new road that I havent seen before and took his chances. This trilogy is a legitimate example of how, as an artist, you have to learn how to take risks. Taking on a task like this was bold and showed their matur ity, which I loved. Midnight Show is an exciting, thrilling track that provides a one-sided but riveting experience that will change your perspective of The Killers. 11. Everything Will Be Alright This last song formally completes the album with no disappointment. Even as the slowest and longest song on the album (almost 6 minutes long), it doesnt cease to impress. Barely anything is used literally, but thats the beauty of it: uncovering what the song truly means. After some thought and consideration (and research, of course), I finally understood: the narrator has been searching for the one, and when hes given up hope, he meets this girl who seems perfect. The catch? Shes already in a relationship. At least, thats what I got out of it and even though its cliche, I certainly dont expect every song to be out-of-the-box thinking. The Killers make up for that by the alluring use of the synthesizers, and that beat we know all too well that lies within every song of theirs. It may not be the most enthralling track on the album, but it closes the album with a replenished and finished feeling.

An Ontological Essay from the Perspective of Tanabe Hajime’s Metanoetics Essay Example

An Ontological Essay from the Perspective of Tanabe Hajime’s Metanoetics Essay Example An Ontological Essay from the Perspective of Tanabe Hajime’s Metanoetics Essay An Ontological Essay from the Perspective of Tanabe Hajime’s Metanoetics Essay An Ontological Essay from the Perspective ofTanabe Hajime’s Metanoetics Abstraction:As we follow the manner of metanoetics, or philosophical manner of penitence, emptiness will come up as the true topographic point of the political and religious. We Begin from the cardinal inquiriesWhat is being? What am I? What is the sense and intent of my being? What is my relationship with everything else that is?In seeking to reply these inquiries we found that the ontological, religious and political coexist in emptiness, attesting themselves as the conditions of the true human manner of being: in an interconnection with all comparative egos. Introduction: On emptiness and the ontological skyline. Long has passed since doctrine stopped being a echt concern about how to live in the rational sense, every bit good as the moral and the simply matter-of-fact. What will here be set Forth is non a method or a philosophy, non even a system foreign to the West, for the development of metanoetics as a doctrine must be lived- rather than understood1. For that, one must non merely read the corresponding literature, as could be the instance of this research paper, but must put itself up face to face with the bounds of our being in the universe, i.e. , our human status. a. The philosophical significance of A†ºA «nyatA? . That which determines us as human existences is beyond anything that might exceed cultural, cultural, spiritual or sexual barriers. By this we mean that we are looking for a status that does non imply a first individual. A theory of the human passions, for illustration, requires the passions themselves- universal as they may be- to be attached to aegothat identifies them as such, that holds them throughout clip, and organizes them spatiotemporally. This manner, they conform an individuality that lasts and ever holds a protagonist portion. This individuality is calledegoand is itself a substance. Theegoas a substance is understood as â€Å"a manner of being harmonizing to which an entity preserves itself 1 Tanabe Hajime tells us in the foreword toDoctrine as Metanoetics,aˆâ€ ¡Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã¢â‚¬ e?â€Å"aa?-a? ¦a? ®aâ€Å"?a ­Ã‚ ¦aˆ? (ZangedA? to shite no tetsugaku) , published in 1945, that he found himself in a moral and philosophical quandary: on one manus, as a philosopher, wise man and moral mention to his pupils, he should knock the patriot and imperial political stance of 2nd universe war Japan: a political stance that was taking 100s of Nipponese citizens to their decease for the incorrect ideals. On the other manus, as a good citizen of the Nipponese Empire, he did non with to disgrace his state fueling the sezession motions that would split a state in a clip of crisis. Therefore, faced with such impotence and weakness to get the better of the moral demands of such fortunes, he resigned to his chair in doctrine and fled to the mountains to reflect on his powerlessness. From this experience arisesmetanoeticsas a doctrine.Vid. Hajime Tanabe, Doctrine as Metanoetics, erectile dysfunction. James W. Heisig, trans. Takeuchi Yoshinori, James W. Heisig, and Valdo Viglielmo,Nazan Studies in Religion and Culture( Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986 ) . pp. xlix-lxii self-identically† 2. We look for something that does non mention to one or another peculiar human being, non even to the topic in general as a nonnatural structure3, but instead to a human manner of being â€Å" that does non acknowledge grasping by the ego†4. Buddhist idea has called this manner of being, which transcends subjectiveness as a substance,emptiness(A†ºA «nyatA?, in Sanskrit, c ©? (kA «) in Nipponese ) 5. We must first understand whatA†ºA «nyatA?agencies. Nishitani Keiji tells us: â€Å"Emptiness in the sense of A†ºA «nyatA?is emptiness merely when it empties itself even of the point of view that represents it as some â€Å"thing† that is emptiness†6. Therefore, because of this, merely on the point of view of emptiness can we â€Å" become manifest in our ainsuchness7 as concrete human existences, as persons with both organic structure and personality. And at the same clip, it is the point at which everything around us becomes manifest in its ainsuchness†8 If emptiness is man’s and everything else’ssuchness, and is besides, â€Å"in Buddhism â€Å"non-ego† [ c„‘ (muga) ] †9 we could reason that man’s true nature does non come to be from the point of view of subjectiveness as we understand it now, but possibly from the point of view of a non-subjective subjectiveness in the sense that Nishitani speaks of a personal impersonality10 ; or in the sense in which Masao Abe says that the â€Å"unachievable itself is the true Self†.11 2 Keiji Nishitani,Religion and Nothingness, trans. Jan Van Bragt,Nazan Studies in Religion and Culture ( Berkeley: University Of California Press, 1983 ) . p. 112 3 â€Å"The propositionI think[ †¦ ] contains the signifier of any of understanding’s judgements as such and accompanies all classs as their vehicle. Immanuel Kant,Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Werner S. Pluhar ( Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996 ) . (KrV) p. 387, A 348 of the academy edition. 4 Nishitani,Religion and Nothingness. p. 107. 5 It is of import to maintain in head that c ©? (kA «) , emptiness, is non the same as c„? (mu) , nothingness. The 2nd term, harmonizing to Van Bragt’s glossary, refers to the western void of Heidegger and Sartre (Nichts, neant) as a comparative void. Merely when we speak of absolute nothingness c µÃ‚ ¶ac„? (zettai mu) , can we place nothingness and emptiness. Tanabe uses the term ‘absolute nothingness’ while Nishitani utilizations ‘emptiness’ . Our rubric retains the Sanskrit for aesthetic grounds. Harmonizing to our statement, absolute void and emptiness refer to the same vacuity.Vid.The glossary entries â€Å"Emptiness [ c ©?kA «] † and â€Å"Nothingness [ c„?mu] † in the glossaries ofibid. pp. 296 y 300 severally, and James W. Heisig, Thomas P. Kasulis, and John C. Maraldo, eds. ,Nipponese Doctrine: A Sourcebook,Nanzan Library of Asiatic Reilgion and Culture( Capital of hawaii: University of Hawaii, 2011 ) . pp. 1252 and 1259, severally every bit good as â€Å"absolute nothingness† p. 1249. 6 Nishitani,Religion and Nothingness. p. 96. The topic, allow us remember Kant, can merely stand for itself objects through the purea prioriintuitions of clip and infinite. ( Kant,Krv. B73 ) it can non stand for to itself anything that is non itself in a clip and infinite. The topic could merely stand for emptiness as a â€Å"thing† . For Kant, emptiness can non be represented, for this would intend that we could hold the representation of pure intuition of infinite as such. 7 The term suchness in Nipponese is a ¦Ã¢â‚¬Å¡a ®Y (nyojitsu) . a ¦Ã¢â‚¬Å¡ (nyo) , which means â€Å"like† , â€Å"such† , â€Å"thus† and a ®Y (jitsu) , which means â€Å"truth† .Vid.Nishitani,Religion and Nothingness. p. 304 â€Å"Suchness† 8 Ibid. p. 90 ( Italics ours ) 9Ibid. pp. 33 and 300. 10 Nishitani explains that he is non â€Å"Using the term â€Å"impersonal, † in its ordinary sense, as the opposite word of personal† but that it refers to something elemental, more basic than the â€Å"personal† [ †¦/†¦ ] A quality is implied here oftranspersonality, orimpersonality.† Subsequently he says, â€Å"The non-differentiating love that makes the Sun rise on the immorality every bit good as the good, on the enemy every bit good as the ally, contains, as we said, the quality of non-ego. [ †¦ ] The Sun in the sky makes no picks approximately where to reflect its beams [ †¦ ] There is no selfishness in its polishing. This deficiency of selfishness is what is meant by non-ego, oremptiness(A†ºA «nyatA?) †ibid. pp. 40, 59-60. 11 Masao Abe,Zen and Western Thought( Capital of hawaii: University of Hawaii Press, 1985 ) . p. 12 Nishitani does non touch accidentally to a locative position when he says â€Å"the point of view ofA†ºA «nyatA?† . Emptiness must non be understood as a ‘thing’ , but as a topographic point a †°Ã‹â€  (basho) .12 Heisig explains what Nishida understands asbashoas follows: â€Å"The topographic pointof this logic refers every bit much to where one is coming from as to where one is traveling. It is non a affair merely of bodily location† . 13 This suggests that adult male, on one manus ‘comes’ from atopographic pointdifferent to this concentric point of view, to which it wishes to return, and, on the other, it is bound to this ‘standpoint of subjectivity’ . The inability to dwell in thetopographic pointof emptiness, the non being able to travel back to our home-ground14, to our naturalness (jinen hA?nen) 15, because of self-attachment ; the ultimate inability to exceed our ainego,is our human status. B. The ontological skyline Thetopographic pointof emptiness is a topographic point where theegois continuously displaced. The inability to brood in thetopographic pointof emptiness belongs to anontological skylinethat ever determines our experience. The skyline is perceived as being in the far distance by the egoistic subjectiveness due to the fact that it is foreign to its point of view. In the metaphysical tradition, that which illuminates the skyline, that presence, has been called being,and the darkness that limits this visible radiation, that stands â€Å"behind† the line of the skyline has been calledvoid. However, the visible radiation that vanishes behind the skyline does non disappear ; it becomes morning behind the skyline. Our human status entails non being able to see the entirety of being or being â€Å"as a whole† 16 and therefore remain standing ashore looking to that skyline and separating objects in the darkness of void. First, the universe appears under the strategy of representation, that is, as objects set up in a clip and infinite ; objects that are already at that place in a universe governed by the rule of sufficient ground.Self-naturepushes theegoto indulge in existences themselves17. Returning to theKernel of TruthHeidegger provinces: â€Å"Precisely in the grading and planning of this 12Vid.entry â€Å"topographic point(basho) † in the glossary of Heisig, Kasulis, and Maraldo, eds. ,Nipponese Doctrine: A Sourcebook. p. 1260. 13 James W. Heisig, The Religious Philosophy of the Kyoto School, inThe Religious Philosophy of Hajime Tanabe. The Metanoetic Imperative, erectile dysfunction. James Heisig and Taitetsu Unno,Nazan Studies in Religion and Culture( Fremont, CA: Asiatic Humanities Press, 1990 ) .p. 29. 14 a‚‚a (moto) in Nipponese.Vid.the glossary entry for â€Å"Ground† in Nishitani,Religion and Nothingness. pp. 297-8. 15 â€Å"Literally being what one is oneself in virtuousness of the Dharma that makes things to be what they are† Tanabe,Doctrine as Metanoetics. p. 299 n. 2 This term besides relates to the impression of  ¬c„?a?ˆc†°Ã‚ © ihonrai-muichimotsu) which means that things have nil by nature, that is, nil if qualities are merely given by the thought transcendental topic, for without the topic there are no qualities. Then adult male should non hold anything by nature, when idea of apart of its nonnatural representative topic strategy. 16 This impression besides appears in Martin Heidegger, On the Essence of Truth, inBasic Hagiographas, erectile dysfunction. David Farrell Krell ( New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought, 2008 ) . â€Å"However, from the point of position of mundane computations and preoccupations this â€Å"as a whole† appears to be incalculable and inexplicable. It can non be understood on the footing of the existences opened up in any given instance [ †¦ ] † P. 129. 17 We take this penetration chiefly from Martin Heidegger, What Is Metaphysics? , inBasic Hagiographas, erectile dysfunction. David Farrell Krell ( New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought, 2008 ) . pp. 94-5. omniscience, this mere knowing, the openedness of being gets flattened out into the evident void into what is no longer even a affair of indifference, but is simply forgotten.†18. Our inquiries go beyond the existences themselves, beyond representation. Merely as Heidegger inWas ist Metaphysik?we wonder for an original19 void, which we have called absolute void or emptiness. We shall endeavour to clear up that in the following subdivision. II. The Topographic point of Nothingness Harmonizing toWhat is Metaphysicss?In scientific oppugning â€Å"The relation to the universe that pervades all the scientific disciplines as such Lashkar-e-Taibas them- each harmonizing to its peculiar content and manner of being- seek existences in themselves in order to do them objects of probe and to find their grounds.†20 â€Å"Science- says Heidegger subsequently on- wants to cognize nil of the nothing.†21 Nishitani, nevertheless, says the followers: â€Å"Nothingness† is by and large forced into a relationship with â€Å"being† and made to function as its negation, taking to its construct as something that â€Å"is† nil because it â€Å"is not† being. This seems to be particularly apparent in Western idea, even in the â€Å"nihility of nihilism.†22 Let us be clear so: harmonizing to this position, void is merely something in resistance to being. That is, it is a complement to the binary compound being/nothingness. Nothingness is â€Å"nonbeing pure and simple†23, or â€Å"The complete negation of the entirety of being† 24 of which scientific discipline wants to cognize nil about, because it merely cares about being, which begs Heidegger to inquire the inquiry â€Å"But when we give up the nil in such a manner, do we non profess it? †25 In this essay, the nil or nothingness appears as a force that breaks the composure and the sense of being ; as an â€Å"indeterminateness of that in the face of which and for which we become dying [ it ] is no mere deficiency of finding, but instead the indispensable impossibleness of finding it†26. In nothingness â€Å"All things and we ourselves sink into indifference. [ †¦ ] The fadeout of existences as a whole that closes in on us in anxiousness oppresses us. We can acquire no clasp on things.

Preparing to Conduct Business Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Preparing to Conduct Business - Research Paper Example The organization chart should focus on specific roles and responsibilities instead of individual workers. If the organizational structure does not exist it means that job duties, roles and responsibilities are frequently neglected. If the gap in responsibilities exist than no one will acknowledge the accountability part or take the responsibilities of their duties, instead they will be pointing fingers. Basically the gap is the one thing which leads the company to identify the areas in the organization which require improvement. This improvement may include training and development of a single employee or it might include the restructuring of a whole department or more than one department. If the organization lacks a structure, the productivity and efficiency of the organization can suffer a lot as the basic factor of accountability is missing. If the organization lacks a structure or if it is weak, conflicts can arise because employees are not clearly informed about their job description, which includes the job duties and job responsibilities. Conflicts can occur as everyone will put the task on the shoulder of other employee as no one knows who has to perform it or how it will get done. Another cause which can lead to conflict is that when people having no authority tend to seek control in the organization. Due to this reason many responsibilities and roles can suffer including managerial and non-managerial as the organizational hierarchy doesn’t exist. The whole effect of the problem that occurs due to lack of organizational structure results in reduced productivity and poor operations which lead to low profitability. As the responsibilities are not clear to management individuals or management teams, everyone lacks coordination and right direction to generate profits (Hill and Jones, 2010). Here we can also say the strategic management part is absent in

Industry and Company Analysis - strategy of management Assignment

Industry and Company Analysis - strategy of management - Assignment Example Customer loyalty is not really an issue in this sector as convenience stores will sell the same or similar produces across the board, leaving no buyer switching cost (IBIS World Market Research, 2011b). The second force is the threat of substitute services. The biggest threat to the convenience store sector is supermarkets, which have reported an annual growth of 3.4% in the last 5 years (compared to the -0.4% of convenience store sector). This is because of a general move towards supermarket sales in general, plus many of the supermarket chains entered into the convenience store sector. There is little to no cost to the consumer to change to a substitute service, increasing the threat. The bargaining power of the customer is dependent on many factors, including the location of the convenience store and surrounding options. However, in many cases (particularly in urban areas) customers will have a price sensitivity that may cause them to move to another rival chain. The buyer volume is much lower than for supermarkets, which means that the convenience store sector can be more sensitive to changes in customer power. The bargaining power of suppliers in this sector is interesting, because many of the companies within the convenience store sector will be using the same suppliers. This is because many stock brand name goods. This means there are strong distribution channels and almost no supplier competition. The impact of inputs on cost is high, but will affect all areas of the sector, plus the competing supermarkets (IBIS World Market Research, 2011b). The intensity of competitive rivalry is interesting in this sector. Whilst there are advertising campaigns for 7-Eleven and the other major convenience store chains, the main choice for a customer is the location and ease of access to the store. This means that much of the competitive rivalry in the sector is accumulating property in convenient

Conflicting perspectives Essay Example for Free

Conflicting perspectives Essay Before initial reading: The comments to the right are my thoughts and questions on phrases I have placed in the essay and how appropriate they would be. Analyse the ways conflicting perspectives generate diverse and provocative insights. All texts composed convey an agenda which is based on the composer’s context. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Jason Reitman’s satirical film Thank You For Smoking (2005) and George Orwell’s Animal Farm (1945) all use conflicting perspectives to convey their agenda by generating diverse and provocative insights. Conflicting perspectives are generated through the use and potential abuse of power, manipulation and the contrast between public and private personas and thus the responder is positioned to accept the perspective the composer has deemed to be valid. The use and abuse of power, the use of manipulation to gain power and the contrast between public and private personas are explored through the portrayal of conflicting perspectives. It can be seen that the responder is positioned to †¦.. the point you’re trying to make is that the use of conflicting perspectives allows for some ambiguity in the portrayal of these themes but you might then say that ‘ultimately we are positioned to accept that†¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ and then you could specify exactly what. Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar demonstrates conflicting perspectives on the nature of power. Shakespeare utilised this play as a commentary on the political situation of the time regarding the monarch of Elizabeth I. Elizabeth had gradually increased her power at the expense of the aristocracy and House of Commons, giving rise to political disputes. Likewise, Caesar has been granted dictatorial powers in the Roman Republic but he is not presented to have misused his power. Instead, Caesar’s hubris is more prevalent this which is seen to be the catalyst for the potential misuse of power. Brutus is aware of this and his idealism for a Roman Republic leads him to join the conspirators, shown in his soliloquy in Act Two Scene One. Brutus uses extended metaphors of a ladder and serpents in order to question Caesar’s ambition in conjunction with power. Brutus states  that ‘young ambition’s ladder [cause him to] look into the clouds, [leading him to] scorn the base degrees by which he did ascend’. Brutus also considers Caesar ‘a serpent’s egg, which would grow mischievous, and kill him in the shell’. The imagery of killing before birth reveals that Brutus is willing to remove Caesar before any tyrannical tendencies take place, suggesting that the assassination was unjust. Brutus would later attempt to justify the assassination that ‘because [Caesar] was ambitious, I slew him’. The conditional language and use of logos in demonstrating a clear cause and effect convinces the audience at Caesar’s funeral oration that the assassination was just, based on the declarative mood in their reaction that ‘Caesar was a tyrant’. However an alternative perspective is displayed through Antony. Even with Caesar’s dictatorial powers he has not seen any way in which he has abused his position, forming the basis of his defence of Caesar in his funeral oration. He uses conditional language by questioning ‘if Caesar was ambitious’ and he uses logos in presenting Caesar’s lack of ambition. Antony draws on examples such as ‘he thrice refused [the crown]’ and when coupled with the rhetorical question ‘did this in Caesar seem ambitious?’ he questions the view of the responders by providing a logical response to Brutus’ ill-based accusations. Antony is able to demonstrate Caesar’s lack of ambition and hence Caesar’s just use of power for the good of Rome. As a result Shakespeare presents two conflicting perspectives on power which generates diverse and provocative insights into his context. George Orwell’s Animal Farm also evokes similar ideas but its context as an allegory for the Stalinist rule of Soviet Russia must also be considered. George Orwell explores the notion of the corrupting nature of power in his allegorical novel (or political satire) ‘Animal Farm’. The allegory is a criticism of Soviet Communism tracks the rise of Napoleon, representing Stalin after the overthrow of Mr Jones, representing the last Tsar of Russia, Nicholas II. and how his power is seen to slowly corrupt prompting in its abuse. At the beginning of the allegory/fable the animals are seen to be harbouring discontent against their autocratic ruler of Mr Jones through their plotting to overthrow humans out of their farm. Major states with a declarative mood that they should ‘remove Man from the scene, and the root cause of hunger and overwork is abolished forever’. This connotes that Mr  Jones has abused his powers in allowing the poor conditions for his working animals. After the animals have revolted against Mr Jones the original commandments of Animalism are created, calling for the equal distribution of power as ‘all animals are equal’. However Napoleon’s use of intimidation through brute force upsets the equality and with the exile of Snowball Napoleon is left in a position of absolute power. Napoleon’s guard dogs are used as a motif to symbolise his power as even after his initial deployment of his dogs against Snowball ‘the dogs growled so threateningly that they accepted his explanation without any further questions’. Napoleon’s power is also seen to corrupt him and he is ironically presented as to be simply a replacement for Mr Jones. Through reverting the name of the farm back to ‘Manor Farm’ Orwell perceives that the situation the animals are in do not differ from the reality of life under Mr Jones. Napoleon’s ‘transformation’ into a man is seen to represent this as the animals ‘look from pig to man, from man to pig, and from pig to man again, but already it was impossible to determine which was which’. The repetition and inversion of the order of ‘pig’ and ‘man’ highlight the confusion the animals have over their present reality. This illustrates the corruption of power in Napoleon and with this Orwell is suggesting that life under Stalin was no different than from Russia’s previous autocratic ruler of Tsar Nicholas II. Consequently Orwell’s use of conflicting perspectives over the issue of power in an allegory is able to provide a commentary of Orwell’s perspective of the nature of Stalinist Russia. Good – you clearly analyse and show the changed perspective of Napoleon but revise and consider how to clearly identify the conflicting perspectives. Julius Caesar demonstrates how a conflict between public and private personas can result in conflicting perspectives of characters. Act One Scene One introduces the idea of conflicting perspectives within personas with the Senators Flavius and Murellius and their perception of the commoners. The Senators clearly see the commoners as inferior with their descriptions as of them as ‘vulgar’ and ‘the basest metal’. This juxtaposes the positive diction used by them to describe the commoners as ‘good countrymen’ when they are in the public sphere, suggesting that the patronising tone used had the sole purpose of gaining support from the commoners. However Antony is  the character that conceals the deepest division between public and private personas, demonstrating his Machiavellian nature. His public persona is presented toas supportive of the assassination by being supportive of the conspirators as he states that ‘it would become me better than to close in terms of friendship with thine enemies’. Give a bit more info of context. Who does he say this to? However his antithesis is indicated through his ‘hope that you shall give me reasons why and wherein Caesar was dangerous’. How? This is implied to be a signal of support from Antony towards the conspiratorshow? but it hid his inner motives of his desire offor conflict against the conspirators. His private persona is presented to be heavily opposed to the assassination and he calls for ‘havoc’ and ‘let slip the dogs of war’, with the violent imagery clearly stating his intention and perspective of the assassination. Mention that this is in a soliloquy before the oration and what we learn. His private persona is reflected in his funeral orations where he repeatedly implies his disagreement with the assassination but never explicitly stating his stance. Initially he states that he ‘comes to bury Caesar, not to praise him’, but this is juxtaposed with his questioning tone and use of rhetorical questions that serve the purpose of suggesting the lack of justice in the assassination. Eg? His private persona comes into full view by the conclusion of his oration where through pathos he calls the ‘stones of Rome to rise up and mutiny’. Link to the dogs of war comments.This perspective of encouraging mutiny is therefore in direct contrast with his interactions with the other conspirators. Explain where. As a result conflicting perspectives are shown also within the characters in order to generate diverse and provocative insights. Similarly, Jason Reitman’s satirical film Thank You For Smoking also projects similar ideas regarding public and private personas. The film is a satire onof the perception of cigarettes and tobacco but not to the extent in which it is condoned, due to the fact that no character in the film is seen smoking. Conflicts in private and personal personas are seen through the protagonist of Nick Naylor with his public support of cigarettes and questioning of its associated health issues, juxtaposed with his private persona where he openly admits to smoking-related health issues. This issue is displayed through Naylor’s criteria for winning an argument, that ‘I  proved that you’re wrong. And if you’re wrong, I’m right’extend this quote with film techniques used at this point. His public persona has a distinct lack of integrity as he provides false promises on the nature of his employer, the Academy of Tobacco Studies. This is shown at the beg inning of the film where on a talk show he promises ‘50 million dollars to encourage kids not to smoke’. This is done despite it being completely contradictory to the perspectives of his employer who asks him ’50 million dollars? Are you out of your mind?’ The anger of his boss on promising the sum of money is seen through the closeup of his face as well as his questioning tone. However Naylor’s private persona admits to the health issues associated with smoking. In a meeting with the MOD group (Merchants of Death, constituting people from America’s firearms, alcohol and tobacco industries) in the film they discuss deaths directly attributed to their industry in order to gauge America’s most hated industry. Naylor boasts that ‘my product puts away 475 000 a year’ and he gloats that the level of alcohol related deaths is miniscule in context ‘100 000 in a year? Wowee a tragedy. Excuse me if I don’t exactly see terrorists getting excited kidnapping anyone from the alcohol industry’. The unconcerned facial expression coupled with the mid-close up shots of Naylor displaying no emotion and the comparison of deaths to terrorism demonstrates the complete disregard of human life. You need to comment on the use of satire as a way to highlight the conflict between what is said on screen and the purpose of the film maker. This is exemplified by the fast transition of shots in the conversation indicating the competitiveness of the argument. This scene is a satire ?on the perceived lack of moral concern demonstrated by tobacco industry through its use of absurdist behaviour, mainly instigated by Naylor. Therefore Naylor’s contradiction between his public and private personas is also another medium used by Reitman in order to convey conflicting perspectives on his satire of the tobacco industry. Manipulation is one central concern in Julius Caesar which generates conflicting perspectives. Cassius is able to manipulate Brutus into firstly believing the idealism of his cause and thus joining the conspirators and enacting Caesar’s death. Brutus is presented to be an idealistic character as he ‘loves the name of honour more than I fear death’. The antithetical  language of ‘honour’ and ‘death’ demonstrates that he has cast himself as the honourable idealist, and when coupled with Brutus’ fear that Rome ‘chooses Caesar as their king’ Cassius is free to manipulate him into joining the conspirators. He uses hyperbole to exaggerate Caesar’s status and he juxtaposes images of him being both a ‘Colossus’ and a ‘sick girl’ in order to prove his weakness to Brutus. Cassius also appeals to his idealistic nature. His monologue contains the epistrophy epistrophe ‘one man’ that reveals Caesar’s true power, that only ‘one man is Rome’. This position is different to the democratic Roman Republic that Brutus represents and admires and he is slowly manipulated to join the conspirators. Manipulation is also seen to demonstrate the power of language, seen through the differing funeral orations of Brutus and Antony. Initially the commoners are irate onabout Caesar’s assassination and the declarative mood presented through ‘we will be satisfied’ highlights their anger but it also serves as a point of juxtaposition. Brutus’ use of logos convinces the crowd that he ‘loved Rome more’ than Caesar through posing rhetorical statements that question the loyalty of the commoners and Caesar’s supposedly true nature. Immediately following his oration the commoners immediately affirm that ‘Caesar was a tyrant’, with this declarative statement juxtaposing heavily with the sentiment displayed in the first line of the scene. However the crowd are manipulated again by Antony to subscribe to his point of view. He adopts a questioning tone throughout his oration in inquiring onabout the validity of Brutus’ statements in order to not directly oppose Brutus but let his audience question their own perspectives. He repeats the phrase ‘Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man’ but the repetition of the phrase combined with the logos in his argument in proving Caesar’s lack of ambition therefore hint at the invalidity of Brutus’ argument. Further on in his oration Antony also uses metaphor to describe Brutus, that he was ‘Caesar’s angel’. This image is contrasted with the assassination, the ‘most unkindest cut of all’ and this contributes to the sentiment of betrayal with Brutus that assists in manipulating the audience. By the conclusion of the speech the commoners are united with one common purpose, shown in the stage direction in that all the commoners state ‘We’ll mutiny [against Brutus]. Anto ny’s rapid manipulation of the crowd demonstrates the power of language  and how it can be used to shape perspective. The manipulation of the animals in Animal Farm also conveys similar sentiment. Orwell utilises a cyclical structure of the allegory in order to demonstrate the power of manipulation instigated mainly by the antagonist of Napoleon and his spokesperson of Squealer. Orwell’s use of the text as an allegory of Soviet Russia creates a chilling context for the reader due to the fact that manipulation was repeated in Stalin’s rule of Russia, leading to the subjugation of the citizens of the Soviet Union. The pigs of Napoleon and Snowball quickly establish themselves as the superior class in the new ‘classless’ society of Animalism. Their superior intellect immediately allows them to create a simplified maxim for Animalism, which was to be ‘four legs good, two legs bad’. The sheep, representing the uneducated class, immediately begin to circulate this simplified form of Animalism and their attitude is reflected in the sheep ‘bleating this onfor ho urs on end’. The onomatopoeia exemplifies the repetitive nature and submissiveness in accepting this maxim and thus of the commands set by Napoleon throughout the allegory. Motif as well? The commandments of Animalism is used as a vehicle to demonstrate the manipulation of the animals. The commandments are changed repeatedly throughout the allegory to manipulate the common animals and their ‘poor memory’ as well as their naivety contributes to their ultimate acceptance of the new norm. The first notion of this manipulation is done when the pigs move and reside in the farmhouse. The new commandment reads ‘no animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets’, with the ‘sheets’ clause added. The character of Clover demonstrates the naivety of the animals in general as she ‘had not remembered if it mentioned sheets, but as it was there on the wall, it must have done so’. The high modality of ‘it must have done so’ contrasts her failure to rememb er the commandment. Squealer’s immediate entry in justifying the change in the commandment is another example of manipulation as he uses his intellectual superiority and logos in order to influence his listeners. He states that a bed ‘is simply a place to sleep in’ and not a physical construct and his argument juxtaposes the affirmation at the establishment of Animalism that the commandments were ‘unalterable laws’. The death of the character of Boxer also reveals the extent of Napoleon’s manipulation. Boxer is a follower of Napoleon throughthe adoption of the motto ‘Napoleon is always right’ which, when combined with his hardworking nature, should warrant great care and respect from the pigs. However when Boxer falls ill he is taken to the ‘horse slaughterer’ to be killed in exchange for money. This reality, witnessed by the animals, contrasts the explanation of Squealer in that ‘the van had previously been the property of the knacker, and had been bought by the veterinary surgeon’. By the conclusion of the allegory Napoleon’s power has become increased to such an extent that even the commandments of Animalism are shown to reflect the changes in that ‘all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others’. The paradoxical nature of this statement juxtaposes the original idealistic thinking based behind the creation of Animalism and demonstrates the extent of the manipulation of the animals. The animals are not aware that they are living in conditions very similar to life under Jones which forms the basis of Orwell’s cyclical structure of the allegory. The bending of the truth by the pigs as well as the willingness of the animals to accept this reality highlights the vast extent and impact of manipulation. Thus manipulation is another medium in which conflicting perspectives can be revealed. Composers of texts use conflicting perspectives in order to generate diverse and provocative insights into their context. These perspectives are shown to favour one side and they can provide an insight into the opinion of the composer on issues affecting their context. This is seen in Julius Caesar, Thank You For Smoking and Animal Farm where the composers, through their portrayal of power, public and private personas and manipulation that form the basis of conflicting perspectives. This is excellent overall. However, there are things you can do to improve. The analysis of AF is almost longer than Caesar. You must mention the end of Caesar in your analysis. There doesn’t seem to be at least one quote from Acts 4 or 5. Find a couple and use them. In the first body paragraph on power, use quotes for Antony from elsewhere in the play, not just the oration. Eg comment on the deification of Caesar at the start and how stage directions are used by Shakespeare to contrast the views of the commoners/Antony/ and Cassius/Brutus and others. Give an example of where we  see Caesar’s hubris ‘northern star’†¦ and contrast that with his humility elsewhere. Shakespeare is always offering contrasting views and creating ambiguity. However, comment also on how we are finally positioned at the end of the play. If discussing Brutus’s hubris, mention the tragic structure. Contrast the way this character is presented at the beginning, middle and then the end when we see the consequences of both his idealism and hubris when he fights with Cassius and dies and then the final comments by Antony. When writing about Antony, consider the way he is presented as loyal, then angry and vengeful about the murder of Caesar, then pitiful, then scheming and manipulative. Take quotes from a range of places throughout the whole play to give the reader a better understanding of the narrative arc of this character. The final paragraph on AF could be edited. It is very long and veers away from the idea of conflicting perspectives in the middle and becomes an analysis of the novel. Throughout the discussion, you could make links between it and Caesar to remind the reader of your point. Email if you have questions.

Productivity in The US :: essays research papers fc

Productivity in the U.S. and What the Government Must Do   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  John sits at home each night with his wife and two children and watches the news. He listens as experts on the economy tell him that the economy is growing and that the GDP is growing. He wonders how this can be, because he lost his job months ago and has not been able to find work since. Has the very country that John lives in moved on and left him behind? This is the question that many Americans are asking themselves, and many more will be soon. In the 1960s and early 90s productivity in America increased by record amounts. The nation was prospering, people had jobs, and they were spending their money. All of this was done by simple government intervention. Now America is looking at another rise in productivity, but this time it may be a little bit different unless the government takes the proper steps.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The 1960s was a period of prosperity for the America. This was largely due to policies and the tax cuts that President Kennedy initiated at the beginning of the decade. His tax cuts were successful in lowering unemployment, encouraging people to invest more, and making the overall economy improve. To begin a period of prosperity there must be something to start it off. A tax cut gives people an incentive to work, save, and invest. President Kennedy said, â€Å"A rising tide lifts all boats† (Garfield, 1). This is proof that the government can have a big role in the economy. The Kennedy administration cut business taxes as well as investment taxes. This caused the Gross Domestic Product to grow by 4.5 percent in the 60s as compared to only 2.4 percent from 1952 to 1960 (Garfield, 3). Many people were worried that these tax cuts would raise the deficit, which makes since because lower taxes means the government will receive less money. However this was not tr ue. The tax cuts increased spending and investment to much that the government’s revenues increased 6.4 percent as compared to 1.2 percent from 1952 to 1959 (Garfield, 3). This proved that cutting the taxes can stimulate the economy enough to raise the government’s budget. This intervention by the government raised the standard of living for American citizens as well as increasing government revenue.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  President Bush has cut the taxes himself. However these tax cuts are far different from those of the 1960’s. Productivity in The US :: essays research papers fc Productivity in the U.S. and What the Government Must Do   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  John sits at home each night with his wife and two children and watches the news. He listens as experts on the economy tell him that the economy is growing and that the GDP is growing. He wonders how this can be, because he lost his job months ago and has not been able to find work since. Has the very country that John lives in moved on and left him behind? This is the question that many Americans are asking themselves, and many more will be soon. In the 1960s and early 90s productivity in America increased by record amounts. The nation was prospering, people had jobs, and they were spending their money. All of this was done by simple government intervention. Now America is looking at another rise in productivity, but this time it may be a little bit different unless the government takes the proper steps.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The 1960s was a period of prosperity for the America. This was largely due to policies and the tax cuts that President Kennedy initiated at the beginning of the decade. His tax cuts were successful in lowering unemployment, encouraging people to invest more, and making the overall economy improve. To begin a period of prosperity there must be something to start it off. A tax cut gives people an incentive to work, save, and invest. President Kennedy said, â€Å"A rising tide lifts all boats† (Garfield, 1). This is proof that the government can have a big role in the economy. The Kennedy administration cut business taxes as well as investment taxes. This caused the Gross Domestic Product to grow by 4.5 percent in the 60s as compared to only 2.4 percent from 1952 to 1960 (Garfield, 3). Many people were worried that these tax cuts would raise the deficit, which makes since because lower taxes means the government will receive less money. However this was not tr ue. The tax cuts increased spending and investment to much that the government’s revenues increased 6.4 percent as compared to 1.2 percent from 1952 to 1959 (Garfield, 3). This proved that cutting the taxes can stimulate the economy enough to raise the government’s budget. This intervention by the government raised the standard of living for American citizens as well as increasing government revenue.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  President Bush has cut the taxes himself. However these tax cuts are far different from those of the 1960’s.